Archives
• August 2008
• July 2008
• June 2008
• May 2008
• April 2008
• March 2008
• February 2008
• January 2008
• December 2007
• November 2007
• October 2007
• September 2007
Categories
• ACLU
• Assault
• Bicycling Under the Influence
• Blogs
• Boating Under the Inluence (BUI)
• Conference
• Crime Lab
• DNA
• Dog Search
• Domestic Violence
• DUI
• Events
• Expunging a Conviction
• Foresnics
• Legal News
• Marijuana Laws
• Marijuana Reform
• Off Topic
• Other
• Police Interrogation
• Privacy Concerns
• Restoration of Firearm Rights
• Seattle Criminal Defense
• Supreme Court
• Supreme Court Rulings
• The Canadian Border and Criminal Convictions
• Theft
• Traffic
• Uncategorized
• Vacating a Felony Conviction
• Vacating a Misdemeanor Conviction
• Video


Recent Posts
• Bloggers Do The Smell Test.
• Overview: C.S.Oye
• Responding with Art
• Crime Lab Issues Continue
• Boating Under the Influence (BUI) 2008
Defense Blawgs
• A Public Defender
• Arbitrary & Capricious
• Austin Criminal Defense Lawyer
• Austin DWI Lawyer
• Criminal Defense Blog
• Defending People: The Art & Science of Criminal Defense
• Drug Law Blog
• Fight ‘Em ‘Til We Can’t
• I Defend The Accused
• I Was The State
• Injustice In Seattle
• Iowa Public Defender
• Missouri Criminal Defense Lawyer
• Stupid Prosecution Tricks
• Underdog
Home Page
• Seattle Criminal Defense Attorney
Seattle Blawg
• China Law Blog
• Marian Gould Gallagher Law Library
• Marler Blog
• Real Lawyers Have Blogs
• Seattle Trademark Lawyer
• Spam Notes
• Trial Ad (and other) Notes
• Washington State Patent Law Blog
Meta
• Login
• Entries RSS
• Comments RSS
• WordPress.org

Subscribe to RSS by E-Mail
Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


 Subscribe in a Reader
Add to Technorati Favorites

Why Innocent People Should Not Talk to the Police

July 17th, 2008   Filed Under Police Interrogation  

John Duane explains why innocent people should never talk to the police. Watch the video here. If you are wondering what the Police think on the subject, you can also watch George Bruch’s response to Mr. Duane’s presentation.

Comments